創建者 疫苗非唯一，我們都有選擇的權利 – 伊維菌素vs新冠肺炎、輝瑞、高端、AZ、莫德納、BNT
COVID Vaccines Are Not Our Only Option. We all Have the Right to Choose.
Ivermectin vs COVID-19, MVC, AZ, Moderna and BNT Vaccines
Our primary appeal in this demonstration is that People have “the right to choose prescription” Other countries are already containing and curing COVID-19 with existing, inexpensive drugs, and they are receiving good results.
在本次遊行中，我們的主要訴求是「人民有用藥選擇權」，這是因為已有其他國家在運用傳統、便宜的藥物時，達到良好的治癒和改善疫情惡化的效果。
Doctors in Delhi used ivermectin to treat COVID-19. As a result, 97% confirmed patients recovered in Delhi recovered in 5 weeks, while vaccine coverage rate in India was less than 15%
印度德里的醫療團隊運用伊維菌素，讓當地確診案例在五週內減少了97%，而當時印度的疫苗接種率還不到15%：
https://www.golden-ages.org/2021/08/15/20210815-01/
Dr. Peter McCullough is an Internist Cardiologist and Professor of Medicine at Texas A&M University. He mentioned that there are about 30 countries now that have treatment kits where they combine either hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, plus an intracellular antibiotic, azithromycin, doxycycline, and then steroids, aspirin as a combination. This cocktail treatment can prevent patients from hospitalizations and death:
美國心臟腎臟學會的創始人兼現任主席McCullough 博士也提到，現在大約有30個國家或地區將伊維菌素、奎寧、阿奇黴素、抗生素、類固醇、阿斯匹林等藥物組合在一套治療藥物盒中，這可讓患者避免住院和死亡：
On June 14th, 2021, Taiwan Centers for Disease Control denied ivermectin as a regular prevention and treatment for COVID-19. As the result, people in Taiwan do not have the opportunity for an inexpensive treatment:
台灣CDC卻在6/14否決了將伊維菌素納入常規預防及治療指引，讓台灣人民錯失了可以用便宜藥物進行治療的機會：
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/202106140122.aspx
Despite Taiwan Centers for Disease Control originally recommended Remdesivir, a newly developed and expensive drug for treatment, Taiwan CDC later made a U-turn on this policy because evidence has shown that not Remdesivir cannot decrease the death rate of patients who suffer from severe COVD-19:
儘管台灣CDC原本是用新研發的昂貴藥物瑞德西韋，但後來CDC也不再建議用這項藥物，因為發現對於降低死亡率沒有幫助：
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202106080315.aspx
Why doesn’t Taiwan CDC give the green light to inexpensive drugs that have been proven effective against COVID-19?
既然如此，為何不開放使用便宜且已證實有效的傳統藥物就好呢？
Traditional Chinese medicine can cure COVID-19 effectively and also prevent serious complications by boosting the human immune system. Plant-based diet also helps prevent the risk of severe COVID-19:
另外，中醫藥也可以有效治療新冠肺炎，預防輕症轉重症的情況，並且提升人體免疫力；透過素食也能用來預防新冠重症。更多相關訊息的整理，可以參見此文：
https://www.golden-ages.org/2021/08/13/vaccine-03/
Our second appeal in this demonstration is that we urge that the government respect fundamental human rights of the People!
我們發起遊行抗議，還有另一項原因，那就是呼籲政府正視人民的基本人權！
The nationwide epidemic alert downgraded to level 2 on July 23th 2021. Taiwan Central Epidemic Command Center also announced a disease prevention guideline for certain occupations and venues. The guideline requires that 80% of teachers and staff working in kindergartens or cram schools must be vaccinated before classes can begin. They must receive at least one vaccine dose for a minimum of 14 days. If not, they must present proof of a negative rapid screening or PCR test within three days. They also have to take regular rapid screening tests every 3-7 days.
隨著台灣在７月底降到二級警戒，CDC公告了匡列特定職業或場所的防疫管理指引，規定「疫苗施打率達80%，未施打疫苗或疫苗接種未達14天者，須有三日內快篩或核酸檢驗陰性證明，且每3至7天定期快篩」，才得以開放營業或到職場工作
However, CDC Director communicated that it is still possible for fully-vaccinated people to transmit the virus to others:
但美國CDC主任已宣布，就算是已施打疫苗的人，仍會將病毒傳染給他人：
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TClU_3mex9I
The current policy made by Taiwan CECC is extremely unfair for unvaccinated people. Now that COVID-19 is still transmittable through those who are already vaccinated, why on earth they don’t have to prove they are tested negative?
既然如此，台灣CDC現在的政策對於未施打疫苗者是相當不公平的，為何已施打疫苗者就不必提供檢驗陰性證明？
Taiwan CECC also requires 80% of the vaccine coverage rate before people go back to work or reopen their business. In other words, Taiwan CECC is indirectly forcing people to be vaccinated. Such half-mandatory is unconstitutional because it violates the physical autonomy and right-to-work of the People:
而且政府規定業者要達80%施打率，否則民眾將不可到職場工作或開業，這項政策已經是在”間接強迫”民眾需要施打疫苗，進而違反民眾有身體自主權、工作權等基本權利的憲法及法律保障：
https://www.golden-ages.org/2021/08/13/vaccine-01/
Since last July, people around the world have organized many street protests against direct/indirect mandatory vaccination, vaccine passport and other “disease prevention” policies:
各國民眾在7月時就已開始陸續上街頭，抗議該國政府的直接或間接強制施打疫苗及疫苗護照等相關政策：
As of August 18, 2021, there are already 639 reported cases of death after vaccination in Taiwan. In the US, 4785 cases are all death tolls related to all other vaccines combined in the past two decades. As of June 21th, 2021, there are already 5479 reported cases of death after vaccination in the United States ever since American people began to receive COVID-19 vaccination in December 2020:
台灣截至8/18已有639人在接種疫苗後死亡。而在美國從去年12月開始施打新冠疫苗後，截至6/21的死亡人數已達5479人，超越了該國過去20年所累積的施打傳統疫苗後的總死亡人數4785人：
https://www.golden-ages.org/2021/08/13/vaccine-00/
Considering the death toll related to COVID-19 vaccines, we must be more cautious about the risk of these newly developed vaccines.
基於接種新冠疫苗後的死亡人數，讓我們必須更警覺檢視這類新型態疫苗的風險。
In general, it takes about 10 years to develop a vaccine. Before the pandemic, the fastest vaccine took almost 4 years to develop. However, the development of BNT and Moderna took only 8 months. They rolled out of the market without completing any third phase trials.They were authorized for human use via Emergency Use Authorization.
由於一般疫苗都需要10年開發（史上最快開發出來的疫苗也花了4年），但輝瑞和莫德納卻都只花8個月就開發出來，而且尚未完成三期試驗就透過緊急授權（EUA）讓民眾接種。
Many prominent scholars around the world have strongly doubted the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
國際間已有許多重量級學者在強烈質疑新冠疫苗本身的安全性與有效性。
Peter Schirmacher, Managing Director of the Institute of Pathology at the University Hospital of Heidelberg has confirmed through autopsies that among patients who died 2 weeks after taking COVID-19 vaccine, 30-40% of them definitely died from side effects of the vaccine:
德國首席科學家、海德堡大學病理學研究所所長 Peter Schirmacher已透過屍檢研究，確認了新冠疫苗接種後兩週內死亡的民眾，有30~40%確實是死於疫苗本身的副作用，並對這樣的致命性發出警告：
Dr.Janci Chunn Lindsay, a scientist who has studied toxicology and molecular biology for more than 30 years, also claimed that COVID-19 vaccines might impair fertility, cause blood disorder and even increase the possibility of virus mutation. She urges that CDC must stop the production and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines immediately:
擁有 30 多年科學經驗的分子生物學家和毒理學家 Janci Chunn Lindsay 博士，也以新冠疫苗損害生育能力、導致血液疾病、甚至疫苗本身可能導致更多病毒突變等問題，而呼籲CDC應該要立即停止新冠疫苗的生產和分發：
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/05/no_author/halt-covid-vaccine-prominent-scientist-tells-cdc/
Pfizer and Moderna violated vaccine trial protocols and vaccinated their control groups who should have only taken placebos. Purposefully dissolving the placebo group violates the scientific purpose to test whether the vaccine has any efficacy; any actual benefit and/or safety issues.
輝瑞和莫德納甚至在疫苗試驗期間，打破了協議，讓原本只能打安慰劑的對照組都允許他們接種疫苗，導致疫苗試驗無法再對疫苗本身真實的保護力、有效性和安全性進行比較與評估：
More facts about the risk of COVID-19 vaccines and how long they can provide protection:
更多關於疫苗風險與保護力失效的討論，可參見此文：
https://www.golden-ages.org/2021/08/13/vaccine-02/
In conclusion, the government must take a hard look at the risk of COVID-19 vaccines and forbid any mandatory/ half-mandatory vaccination. In the meantime, we must remember that vaccines are NOT our only option and we should never ignore any inexpensive and effective treatment.
基於上述狀況，政府應該正視新冠疫苗的風險，不得直接或間接強制民眾施打疫苗，並且也不該只是一再宣傳疫苗，而忽視了其他便宜有效的治療方式！